- Editor Rating
- Rated 1 stars
- Really Bad
- Reviewed by:
- Published on:
- Last modified:
- LegitimacyEditor: 1%
OKCoin (okcoin.com & okcoin.cn) was launched in 2013 as a cryptocurrency exchange in China. The company’s legitimacy has been evaluated based on the items listed below. Every individual item has been checked for the presence of obvious red flags or warning signals. If these are present, an explanation detailing what triggered them has been included. A detailed description of the reasons to evaluate each of the included items can be found below the table.
|Total Flags: 7 (3 Warnings = 1 Flag)|
|Headquarter location||Beijing, China (high risk country)|
|Experience||Less than five years (operating since 2013)|
|Verified Address||The company's headquarter is located at:|
Yiquanhui, Shangdi East Road Shangdi Beijing, Beijing 100085 China
|Verified Owner||Star (Mingxing) Xu is OKCoin's CEO. Before OKCoin Xu worked at Yahoo/Alibaba before becoming CTO at DocIn.com for a period of five years. Xu has been with OKCoin since 2013.|
|Business Registration||Even though parent company Lekuda is registered, OKCoin lacks a valid business license (see Operating License).|
|Financial Regulator Registration||Bitcoin isn't regulated in China, and OKCoin didn't even get its business registration right.|
|Operating License||In July 2016 a Chinese court ruled that Lekuda's license (OKCoin's parent company) doesn't cover its Bitcoin exchange business.|
|Service Disruptions & Unbusinesslike Conduct||OKCoin is fighting a legal battle with Bitcoin investor Roger Ver for violating the terms of a contract to work for the website Bitcoin.com. Even though the partnership was entered for a period of five year, OKCoin terminated the contract within just a few months. Ver claims OKCoin forged his signature on the version of the contract that allows for this early termination, and is backed up by former OKCoin CTO Changpeng Zhao. Ver subsequently sued OKCoin for $570,000 (the remaining value of the contract). This significatly damages OKCoin's trustworthiness as a counterparty, and other incidents such as being found guilty of operating illegally in China (see Operating License) don't help.|
|Financial Audit||OKCoin passed a Proof of Reserves in August 2014, but this wasn't performed by an official auditor and has aged significantly already. After failing to live up the terms of the contract with Roger Ver (see Service Disruptions & Unbusinesslike Conduct) rumors even surfaced that the exchange may be insolvent, making a new (public) financial audit long overdue.|
|Governance Audit||Besides operating illegally (see Operating License) OKCoin was fined 627,569 Yuan (around $94,000) as a result of flawed AML and KYC policies. These flaws allowed a fraudster to transfer over 12 million Yuan to an unknown bank account in Macau.|
|Grammar on Website||Good|
|Contact Information||Although it's not that hard to find an address belonging to OKCoin, for some reason it wasn't included on the website which is somewhat unprofessional.|
|Risk Disclosure||Despite featuring extensive documentation proper risk disclosure isn't part of this. This could include general risks of trading Bitcoin, as well as the risks of using OKCoin's more complicated products such as margin trading and futures.|
Note that items with a warning instead of a flag indicate that these could occur at a legitimate company. For example, legitimate companies may hand out some kind of referral bonus. Multiple warnings will, however, still trigger a flag. A description for the listed items is provided below. This list is meant to assist with identifying the most obvious dangers, and therefore does not provide any guarantees.
Even though Bitcoin’s legal status is uncertain in most of the developed world, there are certain countries that take a more hostile stance towards the digital currency industry. For example, trading Bitcoin in Bangladesh could lead to a punishment of up to 12 years in prison, and also Russia has considered jail time for Bitcoin users. Another example is China. The country didn’t ban Bitcoin, but it did ban banking institutions and employees from engaging in Bitcoin business through banking, as well as servicing or doing business with the Bitcoin industry.
Exchanges that have been running for a long time are more likely to have a battle-tested trading platform, as well as proper policies/procedures to deal with regulatory requirements and uncertainties.
First, you should never hand your hard-earned money over without knowing where it is going. Second, you should do a background check to avoid handing it to a known scammer. Be weary of people without an online identity. Scammers will typically try to hide their identity or conceal their true identity to avoid being easily discovered.
Businesses are typically required to register at the local Company Register. However, not every registration is equal, for example, Companies House (United Kingdom) does not actively check addresses and names. Hence a registration here doesn’t hold any real value. In any case, a failure to register would indicate that the company is most likely operating illegally.
Financial Regulator Registration
Similar to a regular business registration, some countries require Bitcoin exchanges and payment processor to register with the financial regulator. In the United States the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) ruled that these types of companies are money transmitters, and should therefore register as Money Services Businesses. As a result, these platforms must also comply with stricter regulation such as anti-money laundering laws.
Being registered doesn’t equal having the proper operating license. To achieve a fully legal status the license needs to cover the activities of the company. In fact, even exchanges with a money transmitter license may still be operating in a regulatory grey area, because Bitcoin exchanges are special cases. This is why New York invented the BitLicense, and why some platforms are applying for an even stricter banking license.
Service Disruptions & Unbusinesslike Conduct
A businesses can be expected to behave professionally. This means that at a minimum a professional must comply with relevant laws and regulations. Besides the rules, professionals should also respect their customers and act in their best interests. It is hard to specify these “unwritten rules” of ethical behavior, but we certainly do know when they are broken.
Audits certainly do not root out every instance of fraud, but independent (public) audits do provide some comfort in the sense that systems, numbers and policies/procedures have at least been reviewed by a third party (preferably a professional).
Amateurish, cluttered and disorganized websites can point to a scam as many scam sites use text and images from legit websites and other sources which may not work together very well.
Grammar on Website
Similar to the website’s design, limited English proficiency can point to a scam.
Even though cryptocurrency funding options are logical for a cryptocurrency company, it is also very convenient for scammers as the recipient essentially remains anonymous. Hence a lack of alternative funding options should still be considered a warning signal.
Legitimate companies have very little reason not to list their contact information.
Fraudsters will do anything to provide a false sense of security. Actions may include misrepresenting, or even non-disclosure of risks involved.
Persuasion is more likely when the source presents itself as being credible, expert and trustworthy. Common tactics used by scammers to make themselves look legitimate is to pretend to be someone they are not. Alternatively, credibility can also be attained externally with claims such as “Warren Buffet is already using this service”.
Fraudsters take advantage of herd behavior by creating the illusion of consensus or social proof that the service is legitimate with claims that “everybody is already using it”, or by setting up extensive referral programs in which members encourage their friends and associates to invest as well. This automatically triggers something in the mind that says: “if everybody [or someone from the inner circle] wants it, it must be good”.
A business is likely to receive far more of our trust when it provides a lot of free value. This happens because of the rule of reciprocity, which causes us to tend to feel obligated to return favors after people do favors for us.