Fraud Risk Assessment: MegaMine

MegaMine Cloud Services
  • Editor Rating
  • Rated 3.5 stars
  • 60%

  • MegaMine Cloud Services
  • Reviewed by:
  • Published on:
  • Last modified: December 7, 2017
  • Investment Fraud Likelihood
    Editor: 29%

MegaMine is a UK-based Cloud Mining company that was launched in June 2014. The company’s legitimacy has been evaluated based on the items listed below. Every individual item has been checked for the presence of obvious red flags or warning signals. If these are present, an explanation detailing what triggered them has been included. A detailed description of the reasons to evaluate each of the included items can be found below the table. It probably concerns a legitimate business as the company has a low investment fraud likelihood. The details are discussed hereafter. Readers who are familiar with fraud risk assessments by Digiconomist may skip immediately to the results.


To recognize a potential scam, and a Ponzi scheme in particular, the U.S. Securities and Exchange commission (SEC) warns to look out for high returns with little to no risk or even guaranteed returns. This follows from the risk-return trade off; the principle that potential return rises with an increase in risk. A guaranteed return does therefore not exist, and will automatically add 100% to the investment fraud likelihood determined.

Most of the time, Ponzi schemes will not be that explicit in their investment offers, but will offer disproportionate returns relative to the low risk nature of Cloud Mining services. In fact, “the most common telltale sign of a Ponzi scheme is the high rate of return offered to investors“. This is done not only to attract new investors, but also to get the existing participants to reinvest their money. As long as reinvestment rates remain high, the collapse of a Ponzi scheme will be relatively slow.

If it can be established that a Cloud Mining service offers a disproportionate return, then it will add 50% to the investment fraud likelihood determined in this review. Since a case of (severe) mismanagement cannot be ruled out based on returns alone, several other criteria should still be present. It should be noted that mismanagement cannot be classified as investment fraud, but may still lead to bankruptcy. As a disproportionate return  is less explicit than a guaranteed return, the methodology to determine this is outlined below.


In general terms, the value of a Cloud Mining contract should be equal to the discounted expected future cash flows of the underlying mining equipment. Whatever expected return remains on top of this amount should be considered a risk free excess return. This would imply that the contract is sold below the market value, which is a poor business strategy under normal circumstances. To avoid discussion, Digiconomist only considers excess expected returns compared to a stressed (negative) scenario. A disproportionate return is defined as an annual expected return on investment (ROI) greater than zero under a stressed performance.

The assumptions for the stressed scenario are as follows:

  • The Bitcoin network hashrate increases at a daily rate of 0.88% equal to the historic exponential trend over the last year, meaning that the hashrate will be 24 times higher in one years’ time.
  • The network difficulty adjusts on a daily basis, preventing blocks to be mined faster than their target time despite the continuously increasing hashrate.


For MegaMine the expected performance of renting 10 TH/s (10,000 GH/s) priced at $6,460 (32.3 BTC) for a twelve month period is shown below. There are no additional costs. For comparison, the expected performance of (one of the most powerful available miners) a 5.5 TH/s SP35 Yukon Bitcoin Miner priced at $2,795 (14 BTC) has been included, along with the expected performance from one of the (likely fraudulent) Cloud Mining services rated ealier.

The graph shows that the performance of this mining contract is below the included Bitcoin Miner. This seems to make sense if power costs are included in the price of the contract, which have been ignored completely for calculating the performance from buying the Bitcoin Miner. It also reveals the difference between the plausible expected ROI from MegaMine and the ROI offered by a likely fraudulent service. This result cannot be classified as a disproportionate expected return defined in the previous paragraph.


If other, more straightforward, criteria (shown below) are taken into consideration as well, then it leads to the conclusion that MegaMine probably concerns a legitimate investment. The service triggers just two of the listed warning signals.

MegaMine Fraud Risk


Except for the return-based bonus criteria, the applied criteria mostly reflect those used in the Ponzi risk assessment by Bitcointalk forum member “Puppet”. Digiconomist has permission to reproduce and amend the content of this risk assessment, with the goal to raise both the accuracy and visibility of this important tool to assist investors in their investment decision. Neither Digiconomist nor “Puppet” is part of a commercial organization, or in any way involved with a Cloud Mining service.

The criteria “no exit strategy” was replaced by “prominent applied persuasive tactics“. This reflects the common tactics applied by fraudsters to influence their targets. This includes dangling the prospect of wealth, building credibility with special credentials, claims that other savvy investors have already invested and creating a false sense of urgency (scarcity).

Despite all the information provided, common sense is ultimately the best available tool in avoiding potential scams. Lastly, a service that is not a scam might still offer poor products and/or default due to mismanagement.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.