Fraud Risk Assessment: BitcoinMaker

BitcoinMaker Cloud Serivces
  • Editor Rating
  • Rated 1 stars
  • 20%

  • Legitimacy
    Editor: 1%

BitcoinMaker ( was launched in March 2014 providing Bitcoin cloud mining services from Switzerland. The company’s legitimacy has been evaluated based on the items listed below. Every individual item has been checked for the presence of obvious red flags or warning signals. If these are present, an explanation detailing what triggered them has been included. A detailed description of the reasons to evaluate each of the included items can be found below the table.

Total Flags: 9 (3 Warnings = 1 Flag)
Phantom Richesflag-iconAdvertises guaranteed returns
Source Credibilitythumb-up-iconN/A
Social Proofexclamation_warningReferral program awarding 5 percent commission.
Guaranteed Returnflag-iconMultiple products with a profit margin that is explicitly guaranteed.
High Return / Low Riskflag-iconReturns exceed 20 percent per annum at no risk.
Overly Consistent, Positive Returnsflag-iconReturns are completely static despite strong fluctuations in the Bitcoin price.
External Risk Insurancethumb-up-iconN/A
Hardware Equipment
Public Mining Addressflag-iconNo
Pictures of Mining Equipmentflag-iconUses old data center image that first appeared in 2009 link before current (ASIC) mining equipment even existed.
Secretive or Complex Equipmentflag-iconSold products lack any description of underlying equipment, not even GH/s is specified. The only thing offered is a profit margin.
Website Availablethumb-up-iconYes
Website Registration Detailsthumb-up-iconRegistered in March 2014.
Website Designthumb-up-iconGood
Grammar on Websiteexclamation_warningDespite limited text multiple sloppy mistakes such as "bitcon" [bitcoin] and "Bitcoin uses exciting [missing] that could".
Payments Optionsthumb-up-iconCryptocurrency / Wire transfer / Credit Card
Service Disruptions & Unbusinesslike Conductflag-iconTerms and conditions are extremely limited / missing common items like security and cancellation policy (resulting in limited legal basis for doing business).
Contact Informationthumb-up-iconContact information listed (address and telephone number)
Verified Addressthumb-up-iconWHOIS data:
Via Pian della Croce 4
CH-6760 Faido
Verified Ownerthumb-up-iconClaudio Rossini -LinkedIn profile
Business Registrationthumb-up-iconOwned by Tecnoinfo di Claudio Rossini registered with CHE-282.741.339
Independent Auditsexclamation_warningNone

Note that items with a warning instead of a flag indicate that these could occur at a legitimate company. For example, legitimate companies will normally try to persuade you into buying their products. Multiple warnings will, however, still trigger a flag. A description for the listed items is provided below. This list is meant to assist with identifying obvious scams, and therefore does not provide any guarantees that a company is truly legitimate.

Phantom Riches
The most common tactic used by fraudsters is called “phantom riches”. By dangling the prospect of wealth such as “big payoffs”, the scam artist tries to get you to stop thinking logically.

Using the fear of missing out, fraudsters create a false sense of urgency with statements such as “last chance” or “only so few available”. This causes people to agree hastily, before even having the opportunity to think about what they’re doing.

Source Credibility
Persuasion is more likely when the source presents itself as being credible, expert and trustworthy. Common tactics used by scammers to make themselves look legitimate include using fake websites or hacked emails and pretending to be someone they are not. Alternatively, sources can also be external with claims such as “Warren Buffet has already invested in this”.

Social Proof
Fraudsters take advantage of herd behavior by creating the illusion of consensus or social proof that the investment is legitimate with claims that “everybody is already doing it”, or referral programs in which members encourage their friends and associates to invest as well. This automatically triggers something in the head that says: “if everybody [or someone from the inner circle] wants it, it must be good”.

A business is likely to receive far more of our trust when it provides a lot of free value, because of the rule of reciprocity which causes us to tend to feel obligated to return favors after people do favors for us

Guaranteed Return
All investments carry some degree of risk, so a guaranteed profit is a clear red flag. A valid question would be why an organization would try to sell such a scheme instead of using it to get rich themselves.

High Return / Low Risk
Like a guaranteed return, a high return / low risk investment opportunity also defies the common risk-return relationship. The best advice is an old one: “if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is”.

Overly Consistent, Positive Returns
Cryptocurrency markets are among the most volatile markets, hence the performance of any related product or service is also expected to fluctuate.

External Risk Insurance
The fraudster may present some external risk insurance for the investment in order to add to its credibility. In reality, insurance is only seldom acquired and guarantees typically lack substance. Dummy companies are often used to act as the guarantor or insurer.

Public Mining Address
A cloud mining company must have a public cryptocurrency address in order to participate in the mining process. There is no reason for a legitimate company not to disclose this.

Pictures of Mining Equipment
Cloud Mining companies should be able to provide some pictures of the products they are selling besides any textual descriptions.

Secretive or Complex Equipment
Even in the world of cryptocurrencies one should be skeptical about special competitive advantages without any proper disclosure, or when the information is incomprehensible or incomplete. Too often only the positive elements are accentuated.

Website Available
Considering the importance of  domains and websites in the internet age, there is almost no reason for a legit company not to have one.

Website Registration Details
Very few scam websites survive longer than one year, so domains are generally registered for just one year unless otherwise required for the specific domain. For the same reason, websites created less than one year ago should be considered suspicious.

Website Design
Amateurish, cluttered and disorganized websites can point to a scam as many scam sites use text and images from legit websites and other sources which may not work together very well.

Grammar on Website
Many scammers have limited English proficiency.

Payments Options
Even though cryptocurrency payment options are logical for a cryptocurrency company, it is also very convenient for scammers as the recipient essentially remains anonymous. The same goes for services such as Western Union and Moneygram. Hence a lack of alternative payment options should still be considered a warning signal.

Service Disruptions &  Unbusinesslike Conduct
Especially Ponzi scheme promotors will encourage participants to “roll over” their investment. These schemes are not very fond of investors cashing out, which may lead to difficulties receiving payments and a non-responsive or difficult to reach customer service.

Contact Information
Legitimate companies have very little reason not to list their contact information.

Business Verification
First, you should never hand your hard-earned money over without knowing where it is going. Second, you should do a background check to avoid handing it to a known scammer. Be weary of people without an online identity. Scammers will typically try to hide their identity or conceal their true identity to avoid being easily discovered.

Independent Audits
Audits certainly do not root out every instance of fraud, but auditors do have a responsibility to detect errors or fraud in the company’s financial statements.

  • Dear Sirs,
    We saw your stinker published the 12th January 2015 about the service of cloud mining provided by
    We would like to point out that we are a serious and referenced company dealing with cryptocurrency, located in Faido, Switzerland, operating with an own datacenter.
    As regard the “criteria” assessed , we would like to inform you that:
    – no mining address : in the web page at “location” you can find our public mining address
    – no ASIC vendor endorsement: we are using a set of S3+S4+S5 mining machines
    – no pictures of mining hardware: in the web site” location” there is a picture of the building and some ones of the mining machines
    – overselling/unknown capacity: our calculating power is increasing more and more to satisfy our customer’ requests. At the moment our Datacenter Faido 1 is sold out, We are working for the Datacenter Faido 2, that will start mining at the end of March.
    – anonymous operator: in the web site you find all the information about Tecnoinfo, the company managing, phone number, address, references,
    – prominent persuasive tactics: thanks to the Swiss energetic company we have power costs really cheap. It allows us to offer our customers a profitable return and a gain for
    – bonus criteria: to grant the return to our customers uses part of its own gain when the plan does not reach the granted return, just to satisfy the customer expectations

    We are glad to invite you to visit our Datacenter in Faido -Switzerland- to avoid any misunderstandings
    kindly we ask you to revise your review as soon as possible.

    Best regards
    Claudio Rossini
    Tecnoinfo CEO

    • Companies do not tend to hand out free money and certainly do not have to use images from an alternate sources as their own. Your “datacenter” image was already being used in 2009 (link), and also appears all over the web (link). It is not a good idea to counter this fraud risk assessment with fake evidence. Obviously, there will be no adjustments.

      • Claudio Rossini

        Ok give me your company data that we discuss this in court before a judge. thanks

        • Simply proving your hardware would make more sense to me… Legal threats don’t make much sense here.

          As you may have noticed, these types of assessments have been updated. Also this one will receive an update shortly. It would be an excellent opportunity to address the previous…

  • Claudio Rossini

    I would drag you to court for what they have written on bitcoinmaker.
    Why not listed in about the details of your company and phone numbers?